Week Two Worksheet
Use the following rock of abnegations to answer questions 1 to 4. Match the defense that was presented with the corresponding case. compositors cases layabout be located by using the Detailed circumscribe section of contemporary illegal Law.
|necessity |self-defense |defense of others |
|defense of home and property |resisting unlawful arrest | react |
|duress |intoxication |mistake |
|age or infancy defense |entrapment |syndrome-based defenses |
|insanity defense | | |
1. Case 1: narrate v. Dejarlais
nation v. Dejarlais section in Ch.
8 of Contemporary guilty Law
| | |
| disproof used: |Consent |
2. Case 2: Lopez v. State
Lopez v. State section in Ch. 9 of Contemporary Criminal Law
|Defense used: |Insanity defense |
3. Case 3: throng v. Ceballos
People v. Ceballos section in Ch. 8 of Contemporary Criminal Law
|Defense used: |Defense of home and property |
4. Case 3: Brazill v. State
Brazill v. State section in Ch. 9 of Contemporary Criminal Law
|Defense used: |Age of infancy defense...If you desire to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.