Manifesto of the Communist Party, by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels

The problems that capitalism brings to society and every(prenominal) individual in society are so upright that only such a complete revolution lavatory solve those problems.

By presenting their argu manpowert in such grim terms--capitalism vs. communism--the authors make that argument dramatic and powerful, whether one agrees with it or not. some an another(prenominal)(prenominal) important part of their argument is the international horizon of their confab for communism: "In the national struggles of the proletarians [workers] of the different countries, [the Communists] point step to the fore and bring to the front the common interests of the entire proletariat, independently of both nationality" (22).

In other words, the communist movement means to step down all workers in every coun hear from the bonds of capitalism, from the chains the bourgeois property-owners have put on those workers. This international aspect of the communist manifesto gives the working-class oriented theory of the communists a unique feature not present in other such theories. The Manifesto is a revolutionary document and it is meant to be dramatic and stunning.

Revolution to the authors involves inevitable violence to the existing system, a belief which he does not at all try to hide from the reader. To the contrary, they write:

The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly have got that their ends put up be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all

present the reader is both impassioned with Nightingale's righteous complaint or so the short shrift and at the same time appreciative of her comprehend of humor. She obviously knows that a light touch is sometimes utile and effective in getting readers to listen to "complaints" which might affright them. Just as obviously, the feminist arguments she presents are indeed shake up to the men of one 100 years ago. After all, men resisted in the 1960s as women fought for their rightful place in society; imagine how much more they resisted one hundred years ago, when women still could not vote and were not considered excellent citizens.

This religious argument forms the backbone of Nightingale's argument. She does this in order to visualise that it is not merely woman's argument, not merely a contrariety between women and men, but rather a disagreement between God and those men who would continue to try to keep women from expressing and exploiting their talents wheresoever they desire and wherever needed in society.

In the intimately terrible of situations, Equiano keeps his faith, and, in feature, that faith is strengthened by the fact that he survives his ordeals and emerges as a fighter for the freedom of other slaves. When he is in such dire straits that he is ready to die, it is not in a state of solicitude or panic that he experiences such a sentiment: "Although I could not swim, and saw no way of escaping cobbler's last, I felt no dread in my then situation, having no desire to live. I even rejoiced in spirit, thinking this death would be sudden glory" (198).

Nightingale argues for women's rights on a number of bases, including the fundamental one rooted in religion. The black-and-blue male "Christians" who controlled society were confronted with Nightingale's compelling argument that Christ's mission can be fully accomplished by giving women their rights:

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.