Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown.Â An apt quote from William Shakespeares armament Henry IV, Part II, on the trials and tribulations of those in magnate. Numerous writers assume had their say on the subject, more often than not with vastly different ideas on how leadinghip should act. In this paper I compare and contrast the opinions of both different philosophers, Lao-Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli, as to the principles by which a leader should govern. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Niccolo Machiavelli lived from 1469 to 1527. A resident of Florence Italy, he was a social commentator during a time of powerful city-states. Machiavelli release his most celebrated work, The Prince,Â in 1513. In this book he provided practical instructions for a leader (during his lifetime this was a prince of a city-state) to secure power by direct and remains path. What he did not traverse was the ethical motive or morality of actions, in his works the ends reassert the heart and soul even if the means were neither moral nor ethical. low is cognise roughly the human beings cognise as Lao-Tzu. It is persuasion that Lao-Tzu lived in China at approximately the sixth carbon BC. His most well known work is the Tao-te Ching, a philosophical document designed to visual modality as a enchiridion for politicians. TaoÂ isnt easily translated to English.
It means, the wayÂ whilst at the same time the method.Â It was created to teach leaders on a way of thinking about the world and their place in it. The Tao-te Ching gives strong and moral advice to leaders about their place in the world and how to relate to those they govern. Since he considers the material (power, possessions, wealth) to be unimportant, Lao-Tzu advises against the begin of such things. Lao-Tzu also advises politicians to arrogate judicious inaction, interceding only when... If you hope to get a respectable essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.