Questioning the reliability of research

\n\nImage: University of California\nAmong the contribute five talked about investigate findings this year was a admit into the reliability of research findings.\nThe vast, multi-institution lying-in aimed to measure how often researchers could double up psychology experiments and yield the very(prenominal) result. For the project, 270 academics, including researchers at UC Riverside, UC San Francisco and UC Davis, attempted to restate the findings from 100 recently produce psychology experiments. They failed twice as often as they succeeded; in fact, only 36 percent of the replicated studies yielded results consistent with earlier findings.\nThat doesnt necessarily indicate the passe-partout research wasnt holy or authentic, researchers say. Many factors, including a lack of detail into methodology, gage influence replicability. But the breed  published in elevated in the journal experience  does highlight the challenge of producing reliable findings and sug gests that to a greater extent could be do to enable replicatable results.\nRead more: How reliable are psychology studies?If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Our team of competent writers has gained a lot of experience in the field of custom paper writing assistance. That is the reason why they will gladly help you deal with argumentative essay topics of any difficulty.