12 Angry Men is a play about a jury of twelve people. The jury has to decide whether a teenage son is guilty or innocent of cleanup his bring forth. In order to find him guilty they must pay back no reasonable doubt. The play starts out as the jury takes a vote, eleven guilty and angiotensin converting enzymeness innocent. It is without delay up to the eleventh juror who voted innocent to persuade the another(prenominal) eleven jurors to change their minds.
The jurors dispute about the evidence, especially one exhibit in particular, the knife used to stab the sons father. A clerk from a corner store had said that the boy had bought the same knife from him foregoing that day. They argue that this knife is in truth unique and that no one in the jury has seen one before and that it has to be the same knife the boy bought earlier that day. The jurors continue on disputing, that is until one of them pulls out the same postulate knife and stabs it into the table. The jury argues a bit about how pitch a knife like that into the court room is outlaw(prenominal) but then realize the bigger picture, that there could be many people out there with the same knife.
This forthwith gives some reasonable doubt and shows that it could have been someone else who stabbed the father to death.
Another important piece of evidence was an old womans testimony. She had testified to that she saw the boy killing the man late at night plot of ground she was trying to sleep. One of the jurors then notices that while testifying, the old woman was rubbing her nose a lot- a common occasion for someone who wears glasses to do. Another juror then adds on to this and says he...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.